April 22nd, 2010
Apple iPad - Are We Moving Forward or Backward?
Many educators view the new Apple iPad as a potential low cost replacement to computers in the classroom. However, the reality is that with the introduction of the iPad there are now two types of devices: one for consuming content (iPad) and one for creating content (computer). As designed and marketed by Apple, the iPad is a device that specifically puts us back into the role of audience rather than creators. This seemingly simple change in roles may seem insignificant to most, but for learning and teaching it moves was backward to the days of old. Yes, there are and will be practical applications for the devices in the classroom, but relying on these old mindsets will not unleash the potential of devices such as the iPad to transform student experiences.
Out of the box, the iPad’s primary purpose is consumption. Yes, you can do some creation (albeit awkwardly), but primarily it is about content consumption. Apple iTunes revolutionized the music industry with its tight integration with the iPod, yet this revolution was in consumption. App developers, media companies, and publishers are embracing this new platform for just those reasons: audience access, consumption, and control. As such, will it replace the computer? Should it replace the computer? Maybe.
If our role as educators is to cultivate responsible, independent, life-long learners for a future that is yet to be invented, it is essential that we ensure an educational environment supporting and developing knowledge construction, creation, and innovation. The iPad potentially moves us from Web to apps, from open architecture to controlled architecture–a backward move. Are we willing to give up control?
As educational leaders, we have the opportunity to ensure that the last ten years of educational progress (from computer based training…CD-Rom based software…webpages…webquests…web 2.0…project-based learning…constructivism) continues to move forward to the next level. iPads purchased and placed into classrooms without mindful intention, vision, purpose, and professional development will result in usage as a consumption device. This is an opportunity for education leaders to invent new ways of utilizing such devices for breaking traditional paradigms, ensuring responsible purchases aligned with goals, and developing new innovative opportunities for empowering student learning. Are we up to the challenge?
